But this week, we have learned that on one subject we did not probe far enough.
And that subject is the translocation, following the rescue - [link] and release of badgers.
So as this week saw the further ratcheting down on cattle and extra testing, we must update our readers on that omission.
In February 2004, Mr. Paterson asked this question and received the following answer:
6 Feb 2004 : Column 1109W
Mr. Paterson:" To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the sensitivity of the test used on translocated badgers is in (a)positive response and (b)negative response. 
Mr. Bradshaw: The test, which is generally used, for the detection of TB in translocated badgers is a test for antibodies (the Brock Test). This is generally accepted to have a low sensitivity (the ability to detect diseased animals). However it is difficult to give accurate values for the sensitivity because euthanased animals are not always subject to laboratory culture.
Where a badger translocation is carried out under licence (from Defra or English Nature) each individual badger is tested three times. If any of the three results are positive, the badger is euthanased. Any other badger that has been in contact with the positive testing badger is also euthanased, regardless of the results of its own tests
Where an orphaned or previously injured badger is translocated by an animal centre or similar body they follow a voluntary code of practise (drawn up by the RSPCA, National Federation of Badgers Groups and Secret World Wildlife Rescue).
Any animal to be relocated is tested three times and, if it tests positive, is euthanased.
This protocol does not advise in the destruction of badgers who have had contact with a test positive badger.
It should be emphasised that this voluntary protocol was not devised or approved by Defra. "But that is only half the story, as TB Information - [link] has discovered. On the site there is a link to a document drawn up to facilitate the release of rescued badgers.
And from that little gem, we note that the guff contained in the answer to PQ 150583, (above) does not apply to ADULT badgers. They are not tested as to do so would mean a long period of captivity to accommodate the 3 tests plus weeks in between. And that would never do.TB Information also reports:
About 70 badgers each year were reported in 2007 to be released by the wildlife rescue centre called Secret World.
In 2003 a voluntary Badger Rehabilitation Protocol was drawn up by Secret World Wildlife Rescue National Federation of Badger Groups and The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
Although it recommends testing badger cubs, it says the following regarding the testing of adult badgers.
* An adult badger should not be blood tested for bovine TB for the following reasons:
* It will be released to its original location, so eliminating the opportunity for the spread of disease to new areas;
* Recent published data show that a single blood test is unreliable (Forrester et al., 2001);
* It is unlikely to be held in captivity long enough to conduct three blood tests.Marvellous isn't it? Cattle nailed to the floor, tested to extinction and the major UK wildlife reservoir of disease is rescued and released, translocated and fostered, 'accustomed to life in the wild', using, if it's used at all, a test with sensitivity of around 47 per cent.
We're grateful to a member of The Farmers forum - [link] for the above screen shot of a badger found dead in Wales.
(Credit : TFF and Facebook)
As you can see it's sporting a handsome tattoo - 42 11 W - so from where did it originate, to end up squished on a roadside in West Wales? And why is this crazy situation still going on at all?